Open menu
American flag and a row of state capitol domes at night behind a gavel between piles of gold and green game coins, a sealed legal complaint and a phone showing a prediction market app over a football game
Nick Hall
Nick Hall
Senior Editor

Updated 06 / 11 / 2026

Why States Are Suing Kalshi and Sweepstakes Casinos

Key Takeaways

  • Arkansas sued Kalshi and sweepstakes operator VGW on November 4, 2026 under its consumer protection law, part of a wider state push against both industries.
  • States argue that the two-coin sweepstakes model and sports event contracts are both gambling, and Arkansas cites Kalshi’s own safety tools as evidence.
  • Kalshi and the CFTC say federal law overrides the states, the appeals courts are split, and the question is moving toward the Supreme Court.

Prediction markets and sweepstakes casinos are built in very different ways, but state attorneys general now sue them side by side. On November 4, 2026, Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin filed separate lawsuits against Kalshi and VGW, the company behind Chumba Casino, accusing both of running illegal gambling in Arkansas.

The two cases share a theory more than a product. Kalshi sells contracts on sports results and VGW sells coins for casino-style games, yet the state’s argument is the same in both: what counts is what the customer does, not what the operator calls it. “Arkansas law is concerned with substance, not semantics,” Griffin said of Kalshi.

Two Industries, One Legal Theory

Kalshi is a CFTC-registered prediction market, a federally regulated exchange where users buy contracts that pay out on real-world events. Over 90% of its trades in 2025, representing 95% of its revenue, were sports related, according to the Ninth Circuit’s August opinion in its Nevada case. That’s why states look at it and see a sportsbook.

VGW runs sweepstakes casinos, including Chumba Casino, LuckyLand Casino, LuckyLand Slots and Global Poker. Its model rests on two virtual currencies, and states say the split is a disguise for real-money play.

On the surface the two models have little in common. In court they meet at one question: is the customer paying money for a chance to win money? Arkansas says yes in both complaints, and it reached for the same law to say it.

How the Fight Unfolded

Timeline of state and federal actions against sweepstakes casinos and Kalshi, from the New York order against VGW to the Arkansas lawsuits and Kalshi Supreme Court deadline
State moves and federal rulings, from New York’s first order against VGW to Kalshi’s Supreme Court deadline.

The pace picked up in the second half of 2026. Kentucky, New York, Utah and Arkansas all moved within five months, and the CFTC stepped in on Kalshi’s side while the federal appeals courts were still split.

How the Two-Coin Model Works

Griffin’s description of VGW’s platforms is the clearest summary of the model. Consumers buy Gold Coins with real money, coins he calls “effectively worthless”, and receive Sweeps Coins as a bonus. Sweeps Coins can be played on casino-style games, and Sweeps Coins won through those games can be redeemed for cash. “Any reasonable person would call that gambling,” he said.

Flow diagram of how a sweepstakes casino two-coin model works: you pay real money for Gold Coins, Sweeps Coins come free as a bonus, you play casino-style games with them and redeem wins for cash
The dual-currency model at the center of the Arkansas suit against VGW.

New York’s attorney general reached the same view earlier. Its investigation found players received approximately one Sweeps Coin for every dollar they spent, and VGW agreed to pay $8 million in disgorgement, penalties and costs in a settlement with New York.

The Sweepstakes Cafe Precedent

Arkansas also points to history. Decades before VGW launched, internet sweepstakes cafes sold customers internet time, handed out “free” credits and let them play for cash prizes. Courts repeatedly rejected the argument that customers were only paying for internet time, Griffin said, and he called the modern version “too-cute-by-half logic.”

Kalshi’s Safety Tools Became Evidence

The most unusual argument in the Arkansas case concerns Kalshi’s Responsible Gambling features. Griffin points to its self-exclusion tools, deposit limits and trading breaks, which he calls “tools commonly associated with gambling operators”, and to its partnership with the National Council on Problem Gambling. “Although Kalshi insists that its products are not gambling, its actions speak louder than its labels,” he said.

Diagram of the safety-tools paradox: Kalshi self-exclusion tools, deposit limits, trading breaks and a problem gambling partnership, which Arkansas cites as tools commonly associated with gambling operators
Arkansas turns Kalshi’s safeguards into proof that it runs a gambling product.

This is our read of where that argument goes. A product that adds the safeguards a licensed sportsbook offers is building the record a state needs to call it a sportsbook. Dropping them is not an answer either, because a betting product without player protections is exactly what regulators worry about most.

Consumer Protection Law Instead of Gambling Law

Arkansas didn’t wait for a new sweepstakes ban or a regulator’s ruling. Both suits are brought under the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, the state’s consumer protection law, and both ask for restitution, penalties, taxes and injunctive relief. The Kalshi case was filed in Independence County and the VGW case in White County, the Arkansas Advocate reported.

That route matters beyond one state, in our view. A consumer protection statute lets an attorney general go straight to a local court, without a gaming commission acting first. The tax demand is the boldest part, because Arkansas is asking a county judge to treat money made on a CFTC-registered exchange as taxable gambling revenue.

Other States Took Different Paths

New York used nearly every tool it has. Its attorney general sent VGW a cease and desist letter in June 2025, Governor Kathy Hochul signed a formal ban on sweepstakes casinos in December 2025, and the attorney general sued Kalshi in July 2026 with a damages claim that could total at least $36 billion. Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman sued VGW Holdings and the prediction markets Kalshi and Polymarket in June 2026.

Utah and Arizona went further. Utah filed 14 criminal charges against Kalshi and its two founders in late October 2026, and Arizona’s case against Kalshi, filed in March, was the first criminal prosecution of a CFTC-registered prediction market operator.

The State-by-State Tracker

The table sets out the main state actions against both industries as of early November 2026.

State Target Legal route When Where it stands
New York VGW Cease and desist, then settlement June 2025 VGW paid $8 million; sweepstakes ban signed December 2025
New York Kalshi Attorney general gambling suit July 2026 Kalshi moved it to federal court
Kentucky VGW, Kalshi, Polymarket Attorney general lawsuits June 2026 Filed
Utah Kalshi and its founders 14 criminal charges October 2026 Charged; the CFTC is suing Utah
Arizona Kalshi Criminal charges March First criminal case against a CFTC-registered operator
Arkansas Kalshi Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Independence County November 2026 Filed
Arkansas VGW Deceptive Trade Practices Act, White County November 2026 Filed

Most of these cases are still open, so the tracker shows the pattern more than the outcomes. Three of the five states in it have moved against both industries, which is the clearest sign that attorneys general treat them as one problem.

The Federal Fight Over Preemption

Kalshi’s main defense is federal. It argues that because it operates a federally registered exchange, a state can’t treat its sports contracts as gambling, and the CFTC agrees. On October 27, 2026, the agency sued Utah to block the state from shutting down CFTC-registered contract markets with state law, said it had started legal proceedings against nine other states and claimed exclusive jurisdiction over CFTC-registered prediction markets.

The appeals courts are split. The Third Circuit sided with Kalshi in New Jersey in April 2026. The Ninth Circuit went the other way in August, holding that Kalshi’s sports event contracts were not swaps “because they were sports bets,” and on November 4 it refused to rehear the case. The day before, the Second Circuit denied Kalshi and Coinbase injunctions while their New York and Connecticut appeals run.

Side-by-side diagram of the federal and state fronts in the fight over prediction markets and sweepstakes casinos, from the CFTC and the appeals courts to state consumer protection suits, criminal charges and bans
Federal courts are deciding who regulates these products, while state courts are deciding what they are.

The Supreme Court Question

New Jersey has already asked the Supreme Court to decide whether the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act stops states from regulating sports bets offered on CFTC-registered markets. Kalshi has until Dec. 7 to respond to that petition, and until Feb. 2, 2027 to seek review of the Ninth Circuit ruling. Robinhood and Crypto.com have filed petitions from their own Nevada cases, and the Supreme Court has not yet agreed to hear any of them.

What It Means for Players

For sweepstakes players, the first effect is on access. When New York moved against VGW, the company stopped offering virtual coin gambling in the state, and Arkansas is now asking a court for an injunction too. If you hold Sweeps Coins on a platform under legal pressure in your state, redeeming eligible balances rather than leaving them sitting is the cautious move. Check where your state stands on our sweepstakes legality page before you buy coins.

Prediction Market Users

Prediction market users face a different risk. Arkansas says Kalshi accepted customers as young as 18, and New York says users aged 18 to 20 can trade on Kalshi even though the state’s mobile sports betting age is 21. If the states win, we expect age limits and location checks to tighten, though that is our expectation rather than a reported plan.

The labels on these products haven’t changed. What has changed is how many states have stopped accepting them.

Written by

Nick Hall

Senior Editor

Nick's passion for fast paced action has seen him test Bugattis for professional car reviews for the world's biggest car magazine, to covering the high octane world of online casinos, gambling regulation and emerging Web3 trends.

View all posts by Nick Hall
Nick Hall
Senior Editor
256+
Articles written

Nick's passion for fast paced action has seen him test Bugattis for professional car reviews for the world's biggest car magazine, to covering the high octane world of online casinos, gambling regulation and emerging Web3 trends.

Related News